Perry v. McLain
This text of 66 Miss. 145 (Perry v. McLain) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Mississippi Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
delivered the opinion of the court.
■ Although the oral agreement to rescind the contract of sale was not such as a court would specifically enforce, it presents a good ground for refusal by the chancery court to specifically enforce the original contract in writing for the sale of the land. McCorkle v. Brown, 9 Sm. & M. 167; England v. Jackson, 3 Humph. 584 ; 1 Story’s Eq. Jur., § 770 ; 2 Reed on Stat. Frauds, § 471; Fry on Spec. Perf., § 693; Waterman on Spec. Perf., § 489.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
66 Miss. 145, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/perry-v-mclain-miss-1888.