Perry v. Louisiana
This text of 498 U.S. 38 (Perry v. Louisiana) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
PERRY
v.
LOUISIANA.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Keith B. Nordyke argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the brief were June E. Denlinger and Joe Giarrusso, Jr.
Rene I. Salomon, Assistant Attorney General of Louisiana, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief were William J. Guste, Jr., Attorney General, and M. Patricia Jones, Assistant Attorney General.[*]
PER CURIAM.
The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the 19th Judicial District Court of Louisiana for further consideration in light of Washington v. Harper, 494 U. S. 210 (1990).
It is so ordered.
JUSTICE SOUTER took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.
NOTES
[*] Briefs of amici curiae urging reversal were filed by the American Psychiatric Association et al. by Joel L. Klein, Joseph N. Onek, Richard G. Taranto, Carter G. Phillips, and Kirk B. Johnson; and for the Coalition for Fundamental Rights and Equality of Ex-patients by Peter Margulies.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
498 U.S. 38, 111 S. Ct. 449, 112 L. Ed. 2d 338, 1990 U.S. LEXIS 5691, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/perry-v-louisiana-scotus-1991.