Perry v. Key Auto Recovery (In Re Perry)

471 F. App'x 739
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Perry v. Key Auto Recovery (In Re Perry). Read the opinion of the Court — 586 F. App'x 283
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided March 13, 2012·No. 11-60011·Unpublished

Opinion

MEMORANDUM **

Avram Moshe Perry appeals pro se from the Bankruptcy Appellate Panel’s (“BAP”) order denying leave to appeal an interlocutory order of the bankruptcy court setting aside the clerk’s entry of default in an adversary proceeding. We dismiss.

We lack jurisdiction to review the bankruptcy court’s order setting aside the entry of default because it is not an appeal-able final order. See Symantec Corp. v. Global Impact, Inc., 559 F.3d 922, 923 (9th Cir.2009) (order) (entry of default is not a final appealable order); see also Silver Sage Partners, Ltd. v. City of Desert Hot Springs (In re City of Desert Hot Springs), 339 F.3d 782, 787-88 (9th Cir. 2003) (no jurisdiction to review BAP’s exercise of discretion to construe appeal as interlocutory).

DISMISSED.

**

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Perry v. Key Auto Recovery (In Re Perry), 471 F. App'x 739 (9th Cir. 2012).

471 F. App'x 739 (Perry v. Key Auto Recovery (In Re Perry)) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In re City of Desert Hot Springs
339 F.3d 782 (Ninth Circuit, 2003)
Symantec Corp. v. Global Impact, Inc.
559 F.3d 922 (Ninth Circuit, 2009)