Perry v. Key Auto Recovery (In Re Perry)

471 F. App'x 739
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
DecidedMarch 13, 2012
Docket11-60011
StatusUnpublished

This text of 471 F. App'x 739 (Perry v. Key Auto Recovery (In Re Perry)) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Perry v. Key Auto Recovery (In Re Perry), 471 F. App'x 739 (9th Cir. 2012).

Opinion

MEMORANDUM **

Avram Moshe Perry appeals pro se from the Bankruptcy Appellate Panel’s (“BAP”) order denying leave to appeal an interlocutory order of the bankruptcy court setting aside the clerk’s entry of default in an adversary proceeding. We dismiss.

We lack jurisdiction to review the bankruptcy court’s order setting aside the entry of default because it is not an appeal-able final order. See Symantec Corp. v. Global Impact, Inc., 559 F.3d 922, 923 (9th Cir.2009) (order) (entry of default is not a final appealable order); see also Silver Sage Partners, Ltd. v. City of Desert Hot Springs (In re City of Desert Hot Springs), 339 F.3d 782, 787-88 (9th Cir. 2003) (no jurisdiction to review BAP’s exercise of discretion to construe appeal as interlocutory).

DISMISSED.

**

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In re City of Desert Hot Springs
339 F.3d 782 (Ninth Circuit, 2003)
Symantec Corp. v. Global Impact, Inc.
559 F.3d 922 (Ninth Circuit, 2009)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
471 F. App'x 739, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/perry-v-key-auto-recovery-in-re-perry-ca9-2012.