Perry v. Kearns
This text of 13 Iowa 174 (Perry v. Kearns) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Iowa primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
—
The cases of Hollingsworth v. Swickard, 10 Iowa, 385; Frost v. Shaw, Id., 491; and Powell v. Hunt, 11 Id., 430, are decisive of the question involved in this; and following them, we are constrained to hold that the court below erred in refusing to dissolve the injunction. Complainant was in no condition to object to the alleged usury in the original contract between his grantor and the respondent. And see further upon this subject, Stephens v. Minor, 8 Ind., 352; Campbell v. Johnston, 4 Dana, 177.
Keversed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
13 Iowa 174, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/perry-v-kearns-iowa-1862.