Perry v. Jacobson of Fort Pierce Real Estate, Inc.

481 So. 2d 105, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 203, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 5897
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided January 15, 1986·No. No. 85-1407·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellants challenge the trial court’s order denying their motion to quash service of process under section 48.193(l)(b), Florida Statutes (1983). The well-pled allegations of appellees’ complaint state a cause of action against appellants individually and allege sufficient facts to establish in personam jurisdiction. However, the affidavits filed by appeliants in support of their motion to quash service of process do not contain sufficient facts to rebut the jurisdictional allegations of appellees’ complaint. We affirm the trial court’s order denying appellants’ motion to quash service of process. See Money v. Powell, 139 So.2d 702 (Fla.2d DCA 1962); Godfrey v. Neumann, 373 So.2d 920 (Fla.1979); and Hickok Teaching Systems v. Equitech Training Systems, Inc., 421 So.2d 772 (Fla. 4th DCA 1982).

AFFIRMED.

GLICKSTEIN, DELL and WALDEN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Perry v. Jacobson of Fort Pierce Real Estate, Inc., 481 So. 2d 105, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 203, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 5897 (Fla. Ct. App. 1986).

481 So. 2d 105 (Perry v. Jacobson of Fort Pierce Real Estate, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Money v. Powell
139 So. 2d 702 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1962)
Hickok Teaching Systems, Inc. v. EQUITECH ETC.
421 So. 2d 772 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1982)