Perry v. Jacobson of Fort Pierce Real Estate, Inc.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Perry v. Jacobson of Fort Pierce Real Estate, Inc.

481 So. 2d 105, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 203, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 5897

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedJanuary 15, 1986

DocketNo. 85-1407

StatusPublished

This text of 481 So. 2d 105 (Perry v. Jacobson of Fort Pierce Real Estate, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Perry v. Jacobson of Fort Pierce Real Estate, Inc., 481 So. 2d 105, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 203, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 5897 (Fla. Ct. App. 1986).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellants challenge the trial court’s order denying their motion to quash service of process under section 48.193(l)(b), Florida Statutes (1983). The well-pled allegations of appellees’ complaint state a cause of action against appellants individually and allege sufficient facts to establish in personam jurisdiction. However, the affidavits filed by appeliants in support of their motion to quash service of process do not contain sufficient facts to rebut the jurisdictional allegations of appellees’ complaint. We affirm the trial court’s order denying appellants’ motion to quash service of process. See Money v. Powell, 139 So.2d 702 (Fla.2d DCA 1962); Godfrey v. Neumann, 373 So.2d 920 (Fla.1979); and Hickok Teaching Systems v. Equitech Training Systems, Inc., 421 So.2d 772 (Fla. 4th DCA 1982).

AFFIRMED.

GLICKSTEIN, DELL and WALDEN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Appellants challenge the trial court’s order denying their motion to quash service of process under section 48.193(l)(b), Florida Statutes (1983). The well-pled allegations of appellees’ complaint state a cause of action against appellants individually and allege sufficient facts to establish in personam jurisdiction. However, the affidavits filed by appeliants in support of their motion to quash service of process do not contain sufficient facts to rebut the jurisdictional allegations of appellees’ complaint. We affirm the trial court’s order denying appellants’ motion to quash service of process. See Money v. Powell, 139 So.2d 702 (Fla.2d DCA 1962); Godfrey v. Neumann, 373 So.2d 920 (Fla.1979); and Hickok Teaching Systems v. Equitech Training Systems, Inc., 421 So.2d 772 (Fla. 4th DCA 1982).

AFFIRMED.

GLICKSTEIN, DELL and WALDEN, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

481 So. 2d 105, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 203, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 5897, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/perry-v-jacobson-of-fort-pierce-real-estate-inc-fladistctapp-1986.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack