Perry v. Harper

9 S.E.2d 162, 190 Ga. 235, 1940 Ga. LEXIS 452
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
DecidedMay 14, 1940
Docket13311.
StatusPublished

This text of 9 S.E.2d 162 (Perry v. Harper) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Perry v. Harper, 9 S.E.2d 162, 190 Ga. 235, 1940 Ga. LEXIS 452 (Ga. 1940).

Opinion

Duckworth, Justice.

1. This is a companion case to Harper v. Perry, ante, where it was held: “Where a motion for new trial is pending in the superior court, there is no provision of law authorizing the movant to file a second separate original motion for new trial complaining of the same verdict.”

2. Inasmuch as the second motion was not authorized by law, the judgment refusing to sustain that motion will not be reversed.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
9 S.E.2d 162, 190 Ga. 235, 1940 Ga. LEXIS 452, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/perry-v-harper-ga-1940.