Perry v. Harper
This text of 9 S.E.2d 162 (Perry v. Harper) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
1. This is a companion case to Harper v. Perry, ante, where it was held: “Where a motion for new trial is pending in the superior court, there is no provision of law authorizing the movant to file a second separate original motion for new trial complaining of the same verdict.”
2. Inasmuch as the second motion was not authorized by law, the judgment refusing to sustain that motion will not be reversed.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
9 S.E.2d 162, 190 Ga. 235, 1940 Ga. LEXIS 452, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/perry-v-harper-ga-1940.