Perry v. Harper
9 S.E.2d 162, 190 Ga. 235, 1940 Ga. LEXIS 452
Opinion
1. This is a companion case to Harper v. Perry, ante, where it was held: “Where a motion for new trial is pending in the superior court, there is no provision of law authorizing the movant to file a second separate original motion for new trial complaining of the same verdict.”
2. Inasmuch as the second motion was not authorized by law, the judgment refusing to sustain that motion will not be reversed.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Perry v. Harper, 9 S.E.2d 162, 190 Ga. 235, 1940 Ga. LEXIS 452 (Ga. 1940).
9 S.E.2d 162 (Perry v. Harper) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.