Perry v. Halpin, Inc.

196 So. 2d 435
CourtSupreme Court of Florida
DecidedMarch 15, 1967
DocketNo. 35887
StatusPublished

This text of 196 So. 2d 435 (Perry v. Halpin, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Perry v. Halpin, Inc., 196 So. 2d 435 (Fla. 1967).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

By petition and cross-petition for a writ of certiorari we have for review an order of the Florida Industrial Commission hearing date September 28, 1966.

We find that oral argument would serve no useful purpose and it is therefore dispensed with pursuant to Florida Appellate Rule 3.10, subd. e, 31 F.S.A.

Our consideration of the petition, the cross-petition, the record and briefs leads us to conclude that there has been no deviation from the essential requirements of law.

The petition is therefore denied.

The cross-petition is denied.

The petition .for attorney’s fees filed by Petitioner James Perry, Jr., is granted in the sum of $250.00.

THORNAL, C. J., and THOMAS, ROBERTS, DREW and ERVIN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
196 So. 2d 435, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/perry-v-halpin-inc-fla-1967.