Perry v. Gibson
105 S.E.2d 277, 249 N.C. 134, 1958 N.C. LEXIS 419
Opinion
All of plaintiff’s assignments of error are directed either to the charge of the court as given or to the alleged failure of the court to charge on pertinent aspects of the case. However, a careful examination of these assignments of error leads us to the conclusion that no sufficient prejudicial error has been shown to justify another trial. Two juries have accepted the defendant’s version of the facts and rendered verdicts on the crucial issue in his favor.
In the trial below we find
No Error.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Perry v. Gibson, 105 S.E.2d 277, 249 N.C. 134, 1958 N.C. LEXIS 419 (N.C. 1958).
105 S.E.2d 277 (Perry v. Gibson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
State v. Mathis
486 S.E.2d 475 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 1997)