Perry v. Dow
56 Vt. 569
Opinion
The opinion of the court was delivered by
If the defendant had the consent of the plaintiff to sell the property, there was no wrongful conversion in its sale, and consequently neither trespass nor trover would lie. The rejection of the testimony to show such consent was error.
Judgment reversed and cause remanded for a new trial.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Perry v. Dow, 56 Vt. 569 (Vt. 1884).
56 Vt. 569 (Perry v. Dow) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Commercial Finance Corp. v. Commercial Credit Corp.
168 A. 257 (Supreme Court of Vermont, 1933)
Manley Brothers Co. Inc. v. Somers
138 A. 735 (Supreme Court of Vermont, 1927)
Rogers v. Whitney
99 A. 419 (Supreme Court of Vermont, 1917)
Labbee v. Johnson
66 Vt. 234 (Supreme Court of Vermont, 1894)