Perry v. D. Pender Grocery Co.

198 S.E. 622, 214 N.C. 823, 1938 N.C. LEXIS 424
CourtSupreme Court of North Carolina
DecidedSeptember 28, 1938
StatusPublished

This text of 198 S.E. 622 (Perry v. D. Pender Grocery Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Perry v. D. Pender Grocery Co., 198 S.E. 622, 214 N.C. 823, 1938 N.C. LEXIS 424 (N.C. 1938).

Opinion

Pee CubiaM.

Tbe defendant offered no evidence. At tbe close of plaintiff’s evidence tbe defendant made a motion for judgment as in case of nonsuit. C. S., 567. Tbe court below refused tbe motion and in tbis we can see no error. Tbe numerous exceptions and assignments of error made by defendant cannot be sustained, except to tbe charge on tbe fourth issue as to punitive damages. We do not think tbe evidence sufficient to sustain that issue and as to that issue and answer it is stricken from tbe record. We see no prejudicial or reversible error on tbe other issues, and as to them there is no error.

As herein set forth, tbe judgment in tbe court below is

Modified and affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
198 S.E. 622, 214 N.C. 823, 1938 N.C. LEXIS 424, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/perry-v-d-pender-grocery-co-nc-1938.