Perry v. Craighead

562 So. 2d 269, 1990 Ala. Civ. App. LEXIS 132, 1990 WL 31420
Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama·Decided March 21, 1990·No. Civ. 7311·Published

Opinion

RUSSELL, Judge.

The appellants owned and operated a service station in Mobile, Alabama. While in their employ, the appellee’s husband was murdered. Pursuant to the trial court’s order the appellants were compelled to pay damages to the appellee, including hospital and funeral expenses for her deceased husband, compensation owed to the employee pursuant to § 25-5-8(c), Ala.Code 1975 (1986 Repl.Vol.), an attorney’s fee, and costs. This appeal followed.

This case was submitted on appellants’ brief only. We find, however, that the appellants have failed to satisfy the requirements of Rule 28(a), Alabama Rules of Appellate Procedure. Such failure places them in a perilous position and allows us no alternative but to affirm the judgment of the trial court. Cummins v. Slayton, 545 So.2d 783 (Ala.Civ.App.1989).

AFFIRMED.

INGRAM, P.J., and ROBERTSON, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Perry v. Craighead, 562 So. 2d 269, 1990 Ala. Civ. App. LEXIS 132, 1990 WL 31420 (Ala. Ct. App. 1990).

562 So. 2d 269 (Perry v. Craighead) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Cummins v. Slayton
545 So. 2d 783 (Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama, 1989)