Perry v. City of New York

District Court, S.D. New York·Decided September 1, 2021·No. 1:13-cv-01015·Unknown

Opinion

“11: | McGillivary =) Steele Molly A. Elkin i Se Elkin LLP mae@mselaborlaw.com APPLICATIONGRANJED August 30, 2021 VERNON S. BRODERICK VIA ECF U.S.D.J, 9/1/2021 Honorable Vernon S. Broderick Given the likely length of the stay, Plaintiffs’ motion for attor United States District Court fees, (Doc. 333), is deemed withdrawn without prejudice to Southern District of New York reinstatement by letter within 14 days of the appellate court’s AO Centre Street. Room 415 on Defendants’ appeal. The Clerk’s office is directed to term: New York. NY 7 0007 open motion at Document 333.

Re: Perry, et al. v. City of New York, et al., Case No. 13-cv-1015 Dear Judge Broderick: I represent the plaintiffs in the above-captioned case and write in connection with Plaintiffs’ Reply in Support of their Motion for a Supplemental Award of Attorneys’ Fees and Expenses, which is to be filed on or before August 31, 2021. For the reasons set forth below, Plaintiffs respectfully request that the Court stay briefing on Plaintiffs’ Motion until the Second Circuit issues a decision on Defendant’s appeal. On August 5, 2021, the Court issued a decision rejecting each of the City’s arguments made in Defendant’s Motion for Judgment as a Matter of Law or, in the Alternative, for a New Trial or an Amended Judgment, and finding that the jury verdict of October 24, 2019, and judgment of February 5, 2020, should be upheld. Dkt. 332. Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 54(d) and Section 216(b) of the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA), 29 U.S.C. § 216(b), plaintiffs timely filed their Motion for a Supplemental Award of Attorneys’ Fees and Expenses on August 19, 2021. (Dkt. 333-334). Defendant filed an opposition on August 24, 2021 (Dkt. 335), meaning that Plaintiffs’ reply brief is currently due on August 31, 2021. However, on August 27, 2021, the City filed a Notice of Appeal. Dkt. 336. Section 216(b) of the FLSA, 29 U.S.C. § 216(b), provides that “[t]he court in such action shall, in addition to any judgment awarded to the plaintiff or plaintiffs, allow a reasonable attorney’s fee to be paid by the defendant, and costs of the action.” 29 U.S.C. § 216(b) (emphasis supplied). Accordingly, under the FLSA, an award of attorneys’ fees and costs to the prevailing party is mandatory. /d. Significantly, and as relevant here, district courts have authority to award post-judgment attorneys’ fees in an FLSA case, including fees for successfully defending an appeal. See, e.g., Young v. Cooper Cameron Corp., 586 F.3d 201, 208 (2d Cir. 2009) (a prevailing FLSA plaintiff’s entitlement to attorneys’ fees and costs extends to post-judgment proceedings and appeal). Because the City has filed an appeal of “the opinion and order entered on August 5, 2021 (ECF No. 332) and the final judgment entered on February 5, 2020 (ECF No. 313), bringing up Main: (202) 833-8855 | Fax: (202) 452-1090 | Email: info@mselaborlaw.com_| www.mselaborlaw.com 1101 Vermont Avenue NW, Suite 1000 | Washington, D.C. 20005

August 30, 2021 Page 2 for review all underlying orders and rulings,” (Dkt. 336), any decision on Plaintiffs’ post-judgment fees and costs now would be premature. Therefore, Plaintiffs respectfully request that the Court stay briefing on the Plaintiffs’ Motion pending a decision on the appeal and permit Plaintiffs to, consistent with Rule 54(d) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, re-file their Motion for Supplemental Attorneys’ Fees and Expenses within 14 days of the appellate court’s decision. Plaintiffs’ counsel discussed this request for a stay with counsel for the Defendant, who consents to the request. Thank you for your consideration. Respectfully submitted, McGILLIVARY STEELE ELKIN LLP

Molly A. Elkin ce: All Counsel of Record (via ECF)

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Perry v. City of New York, (S.D.N.Y. 2021).

Perry v. City of New York (Perry v. City of New York) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Young v. Cooper Cameron Corp.
586 F.3d 201 (Second Circuit, 2009)