Perry v. Bray & Keel

68 Ga. 293
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
DecidedSeptember 15, 1881
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 68 Ga. 293 (Perry v. Bray & Keel) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Perry v. Bray & Keel, 68 Ga. 293 (Ga. 1881).

Opinion

B. & K. executed a written instrument, by which they promised to pay to D. or order $125.00, on or before the first of November following ; they also gave a lien on their crops for the current year, and from year to year until paid, it being recited that the note was [294]*294given for advances made by D., and promised to deliver to D. sufficient cotton from their first picking to pay said amount, empowering him to foreclose summarily in case of non-payment. D. wrote his name across the face of the instrument, and P. received it for value before due:

Held, that in law D’s. signature was an indorsement, and therefore delivery of cotton to him after P. received the note was not payment thereof. Nor could this written contract be varied by parol so as to make D’s signature an acceptance only.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

White System of New Orleans, Inc. v. Hall
45 So. 2d 649 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1950)
Bank of Cumming v. Bruce
95 S.E. 759 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1918)
First National Bank v. Messer
71 S.E. 148 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1911)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
68 Ga. 293, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/perry-v-bray-keel-ga-1881.