Perry v. Bon Secours Cottage Health Services
753 N.W.2d 166, 482 Mich. 898
This text of 753 N.W.2d 166 (Perry v. Bon Secours Cottage Health Services) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Perry v. Bon Secours Cottage Health Services, 753 N.W.2d 166, 482 Mich. 898 (Mich. 2008).
Opinion
Debra PERRY, as Next Friend of Pourchia Stallworth, and Debra Perry, Individually, Plaintiffs-Appellees,
v.
BON SECOURS COTTAGE HEALTH SERVICES, and Don Michael Schroder, M.D., Defendants-Appellants,
v.
Francisco Jose Rodriguez, M.D., Defendant.
Supreme Court of Michigan.
On order of the Court, the motion for immediate consideration is GRANTED. The application for leave to appeal the April 11, 2008 order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. The motion for stay is DENIED as moot.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
753 N.W.2d 166, 482 Mich. 898, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/perry-v-bon-secours-cottage-health-services-mich-2008.