Perry, J. v. Judge
This text of Perry, J. v. Judge (Perry, J. v. Judge) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA WESTERN DISTRICT
JAMAR BLAINE PERRY, : No. 49 WM 2023 : Petitioner : : : v. : : : JUDGE JOHN D. MCBRIDE, JUDGE : KIM TESLA, DISTRICT ATTORNEY : JOHN LEE BROWN, DISTRICT : ATTORNEY AHMED AZIZ AND : PENNSYLVANIA ATTORNEY : GENERAL, : : Respondents :
ORDER
PER CURIAM
AND NOW, this 17th day of November, 2023, the Application for Leave to File
Original Process is GRANTED, and the Petition for Writ of Mandamus is DENIED. The
Prothonotary is DIRECTED to strike the names of the jurists from the caption.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Perry, J. v. Judge, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/perry-j-v-judge-pa-2023.