Perry (Genaro) Vs. State
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
GENARO RICHARD PERRY, No. 82931 Appellant,
vs.
THE STATE OF NEVADA,
Respondent.
GENARO RICHARD PERRY, No. 83278 v Appellant,
vs.
THE STATE OF NEVADA, FILED Respondent.
AUG 1 0 2021 ELIZABETH A. BROWN CLERVF 9UPREME COURT
v
DEPUTY CLERK
ORDER ADMINISTRATIVELY CLOSING THE APPEAL IN DOCKET NO. 83278 AND TRANSFERRING DOCUMENTS
Docket No. 83278 is a pro se appeal from a district court order denying a motion requesting order directing the Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Department to conduct genetic marker and latent fingerprint analysis of evidence impounded at crime scene. Appellant's appeal from this district court order was previously docketed in this court in Docket No. 82931. The clerk of this court inadvertently docketed this appeal as a separate matter when appellant filed a second, duplicative notice of appeal. Accordingly, the clerk is directed to administratively close the appeal in Docket No. 83278 and transfer to Docket No. 82931 all documents filed or received in Docket No. 83278.
It is so ORDERED.
SUPREME COURT Of NEVADA
10> 1.1471 4i*D
cc: Hon. Jacqueline M. Bluth, District Judge Genaro Richard Perry Jean J. Schwartzer Attorney General/Carson City Clark County District Attorney Eighth District Court Clerk
SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA
01 1947A ceico
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Perry (Genaro) Vs. State (Perry (Genaro) Vs. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.