Perry E. Rearden v. Lamont Smith, Warden, Georgia State Prison

Fifth Circuit

Perry E. Rearden v. Lamont Smith, Warden, Georgia State Prison

403 F.2d 773, 1968 U.S. App. LEXIS 4898

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

DecidedNovember 14, 1968

Docket26183_1

StatusPublished

Cited by4 cases

This text of 403 F.2d 773 (Perry E. Rearden v. Lamont Smith, Warden, Georgia State Prison) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Perry E. Rearden v. Lamont Smith, Warden, Georgia State Prison, 403 F.2d 773, 1968 U.S. App. LEXIS 4898 (5th Cir. 1968).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

This is an appeal from the denial of a writ of habeas corpus to Perry Eugene Rearden, who is serving a life sentence for murder, in a Georgia state prison.

To exhaust his state post-conviction remedies, Rearden filed a petition for habeas corpus in the City Court of Reidsville, Georgia, which denied relief. The appellant has alleged that he was unable to appeal from this judgment, due to his indigency.

Effective July 1, 1967, several months prior to the date on which the appellant’s Federal habeas petition was finally adjudicated, the State of Georgia enacted its new Habeas Corpus Act, Georgia Code § 50-127. The statute provides that the exclusive post-conviction remedy for a state convict, beyond the direct appeal, is by petition for habeas corpus filed in the state superior court of the county where the applicant is being detained. The statute also expands the scope of grounds upon which the writ can be granted. See Peters v. Rutledge, 5 Cir. 1968, 397 F.2d 731 [June 6, 1965], and cases there cited; State of Texas v. Payton, 5 Cir. 1968, 390 F.2d *774 216. The appellant has not sought to avail himself of this remedy.

The judgment of the District Court is affirmed for the reason that the appellant has failed to exhaust his available state remedies.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

This is an appeal from the denial of a writ of habeas corpus to Perry Eugene Rearden, who is serving a life sentence for murder, in a Georgia state prison.

To exhaust his state post-conviction remedies, Rearden filed a petition for habeas corpus in the City Court of Reidsville, Georgia, which denied relief. The appellant has alleged that he was unable to appeal from this judgment, due to his indigency.

Effective July 1, 1967, several months prior to the date on which the appellant’s Federal habeas petition was finally adjudicated, the State of Georgia enacted its new Habeas Corpus Act, Georgia Code § 50-127. The statute provides that the exclusive post-conviction remedy for a state convict, beyond the direct appeal, is by petition for habeas corpus filed in the state superior court of the county where the applicant is being detained. The statute also expands the scope of grounds upon which the writ can be granted. See Peters v. Rutledge, 5 Cir. 1968, 397 F.2d 731 [June 6, 1965], and cases there cited; State of Texas v. Payton, 5 Cir. 1968, 390 F.2d *774 216. The appellant has not sought to avail himself of this remedy.

The judgment of the District Court is affirmed for the reason that the appellant has failed to exhaust his available state remedies.

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

403 F.2d 773, 1968 U.S. App. LEXIS 4898, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/perry-e-rearden-v-lamont-smith-warden-georgia-state-prison-ca5-1968.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack