Perry-Bey v. City of Norfolk

71 F. App'x 265
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided August 20, 2003·No. No. 02-2378·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Jeanette Perry-Bey appeals the district court’s order granting summary judgment in favor of her former employer, the City of Norfolk, in her civil action alleging retaliation in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e-3 (2000). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm substantially on the reasoning of the district court. See Perry-Bey v. City of Norfolk, No. CA-02-7-2 (E.D.Va. Oct. 31, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Perry-Bey v. City of Norfolk, 71 F. App'x 265 (4th Cir. 2003).

71 F. App'x 265 (Perry-Bey v. City of Norfolk) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

§ 2000e-3
42 U.S.C. § 2000e-3
§ 2000e
42 U.S.C. § 2000e