Perrow v. Warden
This text of 60 A.2d 187 (Perrow v. Warden) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Maryland primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This is an application for leave to appeal from refusal of a writ of habeas corpus. Jackson v. Warden,
Petitioner is imprisoned under sentence of six months for carrying a concealed deadly weapon, a pistol. He alleges that the pistol at the time had no barrel or magazine or cartridges and could not be used as a deadly weapon. The question of the sufficiency of the evidence cannot be retried on habeas corpus.Bernard v. Warden of Maryland House of Correction,
Application denied, without costs.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
60 A.2d 187, 190 Md. 725, 1947 Md. LEXIS 380, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/perrow-v-warden-md-1947.