Perrow v. Warden

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Perrow v. Warden

60 A.2d 187, 190 Md. 725, 1947 Md. LEXIS 380

Court of Appeals of Maryland·Decided November 13, 1947·No. [H.C. No. 8, October Term, 1947.]·Published

Opinion

This is an application for leave to appeal from refusal of a writ of habeas corpus. Jackson v. Warden, 190 Md. 717,60 A.2d 179.

Petitioner is imprisoned under sentence of six months for carrying a concealed deadly weapon, a pistol. He alleges that the pistol at the time had no barrel or magazine or cartridges and could not be used as a deadly weapon. The question of the sufficiency of the evidence cannot be retried on habeas corpus.Bernard v. Warden of Maryland House of Correction, 187 Md. 273,49 A.2d 737; Copeland v. Wright, 188 Md. 666, 53 A.2d 553.

Application denied, without costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

This is an application for leave to appeal from refusal of a writ of habeas corpus. Jackson v. Warden, 190 Md. 717,60 A.2d 179.

Petitioner is imprisoned under sentence of six months for carrying a concealed deadly weapon, a pistol. He alleges that the pistol at the time had no barrel or magazine or cartridges and could not be used as a deadly weapon. The question of the sufficiency of the evidence cannot be retried on habeas corpus.Bernard v. Warden of Maryland House of Correction, 187 Md. 273,49 A.2d 737; Copeland v. Wright, 188 Md. 666, 53 A.2d 553.

Application denied, without costs.

Perrow v. Warden, 60 A.2d 187, 190 Md. 725, 1947 Md. LEXIS 380 (Md. 1947).

Pincite

60 A.2d 187 (Perrow v. Warden) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related