Perrow v. Warden

60 A.2d 187, 190 Md. 725, 1947 Md. LEXIS 380
CourtCourt of Appeals of Maryland
DecidedNovember 13, 1947
Docket[H.C. No. 8, October Term, 1947.]
StatusPublished

This text of 60 A.2d 187 (Perrow v. Warden) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Maryland primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Perrow v. Warden, 60 A.2d 187, 190 Md. 725, 1947 Md. LEXIS 380 (Md. 1947).

Opinion

This is an application for leave to appeal from refusal of a writ of habeas corpus. Jackson v. Warden, 190 Md. 717,60 A.2d 179.

Petitioner is imprisoned under sentence of six months for carrying a concealed deadly weapon, a pistol. He alleges that the pistol at the time had no barrel or magazine or cartridges and could not be used as a deadly weapon. The question of the sufficiency of the evidence cannot be retried on habeas corpus.Bernard v. Warden of Maryland House of Correction, 187 Md. 273,49 A.2d 737; Copeland v. Wright, 188 Md. 666, 53 A.2d 553.

Application denied, without costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Copeland v. Wright
53 A.2d 553 (Court of Appeals of Maryland, 1947)
Jackson v. Warden of Maryland House of Correction
60 A.2d 179 (Court of Appeals of Maryland, 1947)
Bernard v. Warden of Maryland House of Correction
49 A.2d 737 (Court of Appeals of Maryland, 1946)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
60 A.2d 187, 190 Md. 725, 1947 Md. LEXIS 380, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/perrow-v-warden-md-1947.