Perrong v. Sperian Energy Corp
Opinion
1 2 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA 3
4 5 Andrew Perrong, et al., Case No. 2:19-cv-00115-CDS-EJY
6 Plaintiffs Order Directing Third-Party Plaintiffs to 7 v. Move for Default Judgment or Show Cause Why Not 8 Sperian Energy Corp, et al.,
9 Defendants 10 11 In December 2019, the Clerk of Court entered default against defendant G-Energy 12 Enterprises LLC. ECF No. [112]. To date, third-party plaintiffs Energy Group Consultants, Inc. 13 and Energy Group Consultants, LLC (collectively “EGC”) have not moved for default judgment 14 against G-Energy Enterprises. EGC are hereby ordered to move for default judgment against G- 15 Energy or to otherwise show cause why they are not doing so by February 21, 2023. EGC are 16 reminded to ensure that any motion for default judgment complies with Fed. R. Civ. P. 55 and 17 addresses the seven factors in Eitel v. McCool, 782 F.2d 1470, 1471–72 (9th Cir. 1986). Failure to do 18 so by the deadline could result in the dismissal of the action without prejudice as to G-Energy 19 for failure to prosecute. 20 DATED: January 24, 2023 21 _________________________________ 22 Cristina D. Silva United States District Judge 23 24 25 26
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Perrong v. Sperian Energy Corp (Perrong v. Sperian Energy Corp) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.