Perrong v. Sperian Energy Corp
Opinion
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
Andrew Perrong, et al., Case No. 2:19-cv-00115-CDS-EJY
Plaintiffs Order Directing Third-Party Plaintiffs to v. Move for Default Judgment or Show Cause Why Not Sperian Energy Corp, et al.,
Defendants In December 2019, the Clerk of Court entered default against defendant G-Energy Enterprises LLC. ECF No. [112]. To date, third-party plaintiffs Energy Group Consultants, Inc. and Energy Group Consultants, LLC (collectively “EGC”) have not moved for default judgment against G-Energy Enterprises. EGC are hereby ordered to move for default judgment against G- Energy or to otherwise show cause why they are not doing so by February 21, 2023. EGC are reminded to ensure that any motion for default judgment complies with Fed. R. Civ. P. 55 and addresses the seven factors in Eitel v. McCool, 782 F.2d 1470, 1471–72 (9th Cir. 1986). Failure to do so by the deadline could result in the dismissal of the action without prejudice as to G-Energy for failure to prosecute. DATED: January 24, 2023 _________________________________ Cristina D. Silva United States District Judge
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Perrong v. Sperian Energy Corp (Perrong v. Sperian Energy Corp) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.