Perris v. Maguire

2017 NY Slip Op 2139, 148 A.D.3d 570, 49 N.Y.S.3d 688
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedMarch 23, 2017
Docket307163/12 3476 83735/13 3475
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 2017 NY Slip Op 2139 (Perris v. Maguire) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Perris v. Maguire, 2017 NY Slip Op 2139, 148 A.D.3d 570, 49 N.Y.S.3d 688 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2017).

Opinion

Judgment, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Wilma Guzman, J.), entered November 4, 2015, dismissing the complaint against defendant, pursuant to an order, same court and Justice, entered October 8, 2015, which granted defendant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, unanimously reversed, on the law, without costs, and the complaint reinstated. Appeal from order, same court and Justice, entered October 6, 2016, which, to the extent appealed from as limited by the briefs, denied the branch of plaintiff’s motion that sought renewal of defendant’s motion for summary judgment, unanimously dismissed, without costs, as academic.

Defendant’s motion for summary judgment should have been denied, due to conflicting accounts of the accident presented in his own moving papers. Defendant’s deposition testimony about the damage to his vehicle supported a reasonable inference of a side impact to his vehicle, instead of a rear-end collision caused by a motorcycle on which plaintiff was a passenger. Because defendant relied upon the presumption of negligence in a rear-end collision, and because issues of fact exist as to whether a rear-end collision had occurred, he failed to meet his prima facie burden of establishing his entitlement to judgment as a matter of law (see generally Alvarez v Prospect Hosp., 68 NY2d 320, 324 [1986]).

Given the foregoing determination, we need not consider the parties’ remaining arguments.

Concur — Tom, J.P., Friedman, Mazzarelli, Kapnick and Kahn, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Ntiru v. WV Preserv. Partners, LLC
2025 NY Slip Op 05575 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2025)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2017 NY Slip Op 2139, 148 A.D.3d 570, 49 N.Y.S.3d 688, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/perris-v-maguire-nyappdiv-2017.