Perris Irr. Dist. v. Savings & Trust Co. of Cleveland

88 F. 989, 1898 U.S. App. LEXIS 2871
U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern California·Decided June 29, 1898·No. No. 659·Published

Opinion

ROSS, Circuit Judge.

The cross bill in this case is substantially similar to that in the case of Alessandro Irr. Dist. v. Savings & Trust Co. of Cleveland (just decided) 88 Fed. 928. For the reasons given by the court for overruling the demurrer to the cross bill in that case, an order will be entered herein overruling the demurrer, with leave to the defendants to answer within 20 days.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Perris Irr. Dist. v. Savings & Trust Co. of Cleveland, 88 F. 989, 1898 U.S. App. LEXIS 2871 (circtsdca 1898).

88 F. 989 (Perris Irr. Dist. v. Savings & Trust Co. of Cleveland) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Alessandro Irr. Dist. v. Savings & Trust Co. of Cleveland
88 F. 928 (U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern California, 1898)