Perrino v. Southern Bell Telephone And Telegraph Company
This text of 440 F.2d 791 (Perrino v. Southern Bell Telephone And Telegraph Company) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
3 Fair Empl.Prac.Cas. 309, 3 Empl. Prac. Dec.
P 8179,
65 Lab.Cas. P 11,653
Angelo J. PERRINO, individually and on behalf of all others
similarly situated, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
SOUTHERN BELL TELEPHONE AND TELEGRAPH COMPANY, and
Communication Workers of America, Local 3107,
Defendants-Appellees.
No. 31008 Summary Calendar.*
United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
March 15, 1971.
Joel Hirschhorn, Abramson, Rosenthal & Hirschhorn, P.A., Miami, Fla., for appellant.
Vincent L. Sgrosso, Atlanta, Ga., Hubert F. Owens, Walton, Lantaff, Schroeder, Carson & Wahl, John H. Wahl, Jr., Miami, Fla., for Southern Bell Tel. & Tel. Co.
Charnelle H. Summers, Jr., Miami, Fla., John Leon Adair, Adair, Goldthwaite, Stanford & Daniel, Atlanta, Ga., for appellee Communications Workers of America, Local 3107.
Before BELL, AINSWORTH and GODBOLD, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Affirmed. See Local Rule 21.1
*Rule 18, 5 Cir.; Isbell Enterprises, Inc. v. Citizens Casualty Company of New York et al., 5th Cir. 1970, 431 F.2d 409, Part I.
See N.L.R.B. v. Amalgamated Clothing Workers of America, 5 Cir. 1970, 430 F.2d 966
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
440 F.2d 791, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/perrino-v-southern-bell-telephone-and-telegraph-company-ca5-1971.