Perrine v. Wimpfheimer

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Perrine v. Wimpfheimer

65 N.J. Eq. 770

CourtSupreme Court of New Jersey

DecidedNovember 16, 1903

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 65 N.J. Eq. 770 (Perrine v. Wimpfheimer) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Perrine v. Wimpfheimer, 65 N.J. Eq. 770 (N.J. 1903).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The decree appealed from in this ease is affirmed. Opinion rendered by Justice Van Syckel. Sec opinion of Vice-Chancellor Emery in the court of chancery, reported in 16 Dick. Ch. Rep. 126.

Note. — The opinion on the appeal was rendered June Term, 1901, but omitted from its proper place. See 50 Atl. Rep. 356.

For affirmance — Depue, Van Syckel, Garrison, Gummere, Fort, Collins, Garretson, Hendrickson, Bogert, Vreden-BURGI-I, VoORI-IEES, VüOOM, ADAMS — 13.

For reversal — None.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

The decree appealed from in this ease is affirmed. Opinion rendered by Justice Van Syckel. Sec opinion of Vice-Chancellor Emery in the court of chancery, reported in 16 Dick. Ch. Rep. 126.

Note. — The opinion on the appeal was rendered June Term, 1901, but omitted from its proper place. See 50 Atl. Rep. 356.

For affirmance — Depue, Van Syckel, Garrison, Gummere, Fort, Collins, Garretson, Hendrickson, Bogert, Vreden-BURGI-I, VoORI-IEES, VüOOM, ADAMS — 13.

For reversal — None.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

65 N.J. Eq. 770, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/perrine-v-wimpfheimer-nj-1903.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack