Perrine v. Wimpfheimer

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Perrine v. Wimpfheimer

65 N.J. Eq. 770

Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided November 16, 1903·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The decree appealed from in this ease is affirmed. Opinion rendered by Justice Van Syckel. Sec opinion of Vice-Chancellor Emery in the court of chancery, reported in 16 Dick. Ch. Rep. 126.

Note. — The opinion on the appeal was rendered June Term, 1901, but omitted from its proper place. See 50 Atl. Rep. 356.

For affirmance — Depue, Van Syckel, Garrison, Gummere, Fort, Collins, Garretson, Hendrickson, Bogert, Vreden-BURGI-I, VoORI-IEES, VüOOM, ADAMS — 13.

For reversal — None.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

The decree appealed from in this ease is affirmed. Opinion rendered by Justice Van Syckel. Sec opinion of Vice-Chancellor Emery in the court of chancery, reported in 16 Dick. Ch. Rep. 126.

Note. — The opinion on the appeal was rendered June Term, 1901, but omitted from its proper place. See 50 Atl. Rep. 356.

For affirmance — Depue, Van Syckel, Garrison, Gummere, Fort, Collins, Garretson, Hendrickson, Bogert, Vreden-BURGI-I, VoORI-IEES, VüOOM, ADAMS — 13.

For reversal — None.

Perrine v. Wimpfheimer, 65 N.J. Eq. 770 (N.J. 1903).

Pincite

65 N.J. Eq. 770 (Perrine v. Wimpfheimer) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related