Perrine v. Williams

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Perrine v. Williams

258 A.D. 982, 17 N.Y.S.2d 547, 1940 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8542

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJanuary 22, 1940

StatusPublished

This text of 258 A.D. 982 (Perrine v. Williams) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Perrine v. Williams, 258 A.D. 982, 17 N.Y.S.2d 547, 1940 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8542 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1940).

Pincite

Opinion

Action for rescission of an instrument of release, on the ground that its execution and delivery was procured by misrepresentations of the defendant. Order granting defendant’s motion under rule 106, Rules of Civil Practice, to dismiss the complaint as being insufficient upon the face thereof, reversed on the law, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and the motion denied, with ten dollars costs, with leave to the respondent to [983]*983answer within ten days from the entry of the order hereon. As a matter of mere pleading the complaint is sufficient to tender an issue as to whether or not the execution and delivery of the release was procured by misrepresentations or fraud. (Bloomquist v. Farson, 222 N. Y. 375, 380; Haviland v. Willets, 141 id. 35, 50; Kirchner v. New Home S. M. Co., 135 id. 182, 189; Wilcox v. American Tel. & Tel. Co., 176 id. 115, 117.) Lazansky, P. J., Hagarty, Carswell, Adel and Taylor, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Action for rescission of an instrument of release, on the ground that its execution and delivery was procured by misrepresentations of the defendant. Order granting defendant’s motion under rule 106, Rules of Civil Practice, to dismiss the complaint as being insufficient upon the face thereof, reversed on the law, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and the motion denied, with ten dollars costs, with leave to the respondent to [983]*983answer within ten days from the entry of the order hereon. As a matter of mere pleading the complaint is sufficient to tender an issue as to whether or not the execution and delivery of the release was procured by misrepresentations or fraud. (Bloomquist v. Farson, 222 N. Y. 375, 380; Haviland v. Willets, 141 id. 35, 50; Kirchner v. New Home S. M. Co., 135 id. 182, 189; Wilcox v. American Tel. & Tel. Co., 176 id. 115, 117.) Lazansky, P. J., Hagarty, Carswell, Adel and Taylor, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

258 A.D. 982, 17 N.Y.S.2d 547, 1940 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8542, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/perrine-v-williams-nyappdiv-1940.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack