Perrine v. Township of Washington

166 A. 82, 110 N.J.L. 521, 1933 N.J. LEXIS 549

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The judgment under review will be affirmed, for the reasons stated by Mr. Justice Trenehard in his memorandum to counsel set forth above.

For affirmance — The Chancellor, Chibe Justice, Parker, Lloyd, Case, Bodine, Donges, Heher, Yak Buskirk, Kays, Heteield, Dear, Wells, Dill, JJ. 14.

For reversal — None.