Home/Supreme Court of New Jersey/Perrine v. Perrine

Perrine v. Perrine

60 A. 1134, 65 N.J. Eq. 719, 20 Dickinson 719, 1903 N.J. LEXIS 315
Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided June 19, 1903·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The decree appealed from should be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion of Vice-Chancellor Pitney, delivered in the court of chancery, and reported in 18 Dick. Ch. Rep. 483.

For affirmance — The Chiee-Justice, Van Syckel, Garrison, Garretson, Bogert, Voori-iees, Vroom — 7. For reversal — Dixon, Fort, Hendrickson, Swayze, Vredenburgi-i — 5.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Perrine v. Perrine, 60 A. 1134, 65 N.J. Eq. 719, 20 Dickinson 719, 1903 N.J. LEXIS 315 (N.J. 1903).

60 A. 1134 (Perrine v. Perrine) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.