Home/Supreme Court of New Jersey/Perrine v. Perrine

Perrine v. Perrine

60 A. 1134, 65 N.J. Eq. 719, 20 Dickinson 719, 1903 N.J. LEXIS 315
CourtSupreme Court of New Jersey
DecidedJune 19, 1903
StatusPublished

This text of 60 A. 1134 (Perrine v. Perrine) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Perrine v. Perrine, 60 A. 1134, 65 N.J. Eq. 719, 20 Dickinson 719, 1903 N.J. LEXIS 315 (N.J. 1903).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The decree appealed from should be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion of Vice-Chancellor Pitney, delivered in the court of chancery, and reported in 18 Dick. Ch. Rep. 483.

For affirmance — The Chiee-Justice, Van Syckel, Garrison, Garretson, Bogert, Voori-iees, Vroom — 7. For reversal — Dixon, Fort, Hendrickson, Swayze, Vredenburgi-i — 5.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
60 A. 1134, 65 N.J. Eq. 719, 20 Dickinson 719, 1903 N.J. LEXIS 315, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/perrine-v-perrine-nj-1903.