Perrine v. Miller
4 Thomp. & Cook 36
This text of 4 Thomp. & Cook 36 (Perrine v. Miller) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Perrine v. Miller, 4 Thomp. & Cook 36 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1874).
Opinion
The only ground stated in the notice of motion to dismiss the appeal was that no notice of appeal had been served on the respondent, Adolphus Perrine. The respondents were partners. Hotice to one was notice to both. The county court, therefore, erred in dismissing the appeal, and the order must be reversed, with costs.
Order reversed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
4 Thomp. & Cook 36, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/perrine-v-miller-nysupct-1874.