Perrine v. Dinan

Northampton County Court of Common Pleas

Perrine v. Dinan

19 A. 624, 133 Pa. 544, 1890 Pa. LEXIS 932

Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Northampton County·Decided March 24, 1890·No. No. 236·Published

Opinion

Pee Curiam:

The court below left the question of fact fairly to the jury, whether Catharine Dinan, wife of Michael Dinan, had a sep[550] arate estate, and whether the property in controversy was acquired by means of, and upon the credit of that separate estate. The verdict of the jury settles the question of fact in her favor, and as no error of law appears the judgment must stand.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Pee Curiam:

The court below left the question of fact fairly to the jury, whether Catharine Dinan, wife of Michael Dinan, had a sep[550] arate estate, and whether the property in controversy was acquired by means of, and upon the credit of that separate estate. The verdict of the jury settles the question of fact in her favor, and as no error of law appears the judgment must stand.

Judgment affirmed.

Perrine v. Dinan, 19 A. 624, 133 Pa. 544, 1890 Pa. LEXIS 932 (Pa. Super. Ct. 1890).

Pincite

19 A. 624 (Perrine v. Dinan) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.