Perrin v. Chase Equipment Leasing, Inc.

27 A.D.3d 1111, 810 N.Y.S.2d 711
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Perrin v. Chase Equipment Leasing, Inc.. Read the opinion of the Court — 9 A.D.3d 839

Opinion

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Oneida County (John W. Grow, J), entered February 24, 2005 in a personal injury action. The order, among other things, denied the motion of defendants Chase Equipment Leasing, Inc. and T-Line Service, Ltd., also known as T-Line Service, Inc., for summary judgment dismissing the amended complaint against them or, in the alternative, for leave to amend their answer to assert a defense based upon the exclusivity of the Workers’ Compensation Law.

It is hereby ordered that the order so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously affirmed without costs for [1112]*1112reasons stated at Supreme Court. Present—Pigott, Jr., P.J., Kehoe, Martoche, Smith and Pine, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Perrin v. Chase Equipment Leasing, Inc., 27 A.D.3d 1111, 810 N.Y.S.2d 711 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2006).

27 A.D.3d 1111 (Perrin v. Chase Equipment Leasing, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.