Perriconi v. St. John's Preparatory High School

290 A.D.2d 546, 736 N.Y.S.2d 698, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 759
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJanuary 28, 2002
StatusPublished
Cited by8 cases

This text of 290 A.D.2d 546 (Perriconi v. St. John's Preparatory High School) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Perriconi v. St. John's Preparatory High School, 290 A.D.2d 546, 736 N.Y.S.2d 698, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 759 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2002).

Opinion

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendant St. John’s Preparatory High School appeals, as limited by its brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Plug, J.), dated December 14, 2000, as denied its motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against it, and the defendant Paris Maintenance Company, Inc., separately appeals, as limited by its brief, from so much of the same order as denied its separate motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against it.

Ordered that the order is reversed, on the law, with one bill of costs, the motions are granted, and the complaint is dismissed.

The plaintiff allegedly was injured when he tripped and fell on a raised and cracked portion of the public sidewalk abutting property owned by the defendant St. John’s Preparatory High School and maintained by the defendant Paris Maintenance Company, Inc. An abutting landowner will be liable to a pedestrian injured by a defect in a public sidewalk when the owner either created the defect or caused it to occur by a special use, or when a statute or ordinance obligates the owner to maintain the sidewalk and makes the owner liable for injuries caused by a breach of that obligation (see, Capobianco v Mari, 267 AD2d 191). Although there was evidence that the defendants repaired the sidewalk on the block where the plaintiff fell, they made a prima facie showing of their entitlement to judgment as a matter of law by relying upon the plaintiffs own deposition testimony that no repairs had been made in the area where the accident occurred (see, Yass v Deepdale Gardens, 187 AD2d 506). In opposition, the plaintiff failed to raise a triable issue of fact. Consequently, summary judgment should have been granted to the defendants. Goldstein, J.P., McGinity, Luciano and Crane, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cino v. City of New York
49 A.D.3d 796 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2008)
Brown v. 324 Livingston Footwears, Inc.
2003 NY Slip Op 51526(U) (New York Supreme Court, Kings County, 2003)
Jeanty v. Benin
1 A.D.2d 566 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2003)
Diaz v. Vieni
303 A.D.2d 713 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2003)
Ostrovsky v. City of New York
2002 NY Slip Op 22803 (New York Supreme Court, 2002)
Breheny v. City of New York
299 A.D.2d 385 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2002)
Calcaterra v. Home Federal Savings Bank
294 A.D.2d 324 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2002)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
290 A.D.2d 546, 736 N.Y.S.2d 698, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 759, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/perriconi-v-st-johns-preparatory-high-school-nyappdiv-2002.