Perricone v. Perricone

859 A.2d 569, 271 Conn. 919, 2004 Conn. LEXIS 393
CourtSupreme Court of Connecticut
DecidedSeptember 15, 2004
DocketSC 17257
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 859 A.2d 569 (Perricone v. Perricone) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Connecticut primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Perricone v. Perricone, 859 A.2d 569, 271 Conn. 919, 2004 Conn. LEXIS 393 (Colo. 2004).

Opinion

The plaintiffs petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court (AC 25461) is granted, limited to the following issue:

[920]*920The Supreme Court docket number is SC 17257. Decided September 15, 2004 Wesley W. Horton and Daniel J. Krisch, in support of the petition. Richard F. Wareing, in opposition.

“Did the Appellate Court properly dismiss the plaintiffs appeal from the trial court’s award of pendente lite attorney’s fees?”

VERTEFEUILLE, J.,

did not participate in the consideration or decision of this petition.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Rostad v. Hirsch
15 A.3d 1176 (Connecticut Appellate Court, 2011)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
859 A.2d 569, 271 Conn. 919, 2004 Conn. LEXIS 393, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/perricone-v-perricone-conn-2004.