Perretta v. Prometheus Developement Company, Inc

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided May 23, 2008·No. 06-15526·Published

Opinion

FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

LOUIS A. PERRETTA, JR.; FRANK  PERRETTA, No. 06-15526 Plaintiffs-Appellants, D.C. No.

v. CV-05-02987-WHA PROMETHEUS DEVELOPMENT  Northern District of COMPANY, INC.; SANFORD N. California, DILLER; JOHN J. MURPHY; VICKI R. San Francisco MULLINS, ORDER Defendants-Appellees.

Filed May 23, 2008

Before: David R. Thompson and Milan D. Smith, Jr., Circuit Judges, and William Q. Hayes,* District Judge.

ORDER

The Defendants-Appellees’ motion to file a reply is GRANTED.

The Defendants-Appellees’ Petition for Panel Rehearing is GRANTED. The opinion dated March 27, 2008, is withdrawn .

The court requests supplemental briefing by the parties regarding the applicability of the ratification provision of Cal. Corp. Code § 16103(b)(3) to the issue of whether the vote in this case was sufficient to ratify the transaction. The simulta-

*The Honorable William Q. Hayes, United States District Judge for the Southern District of California, sitting by designation.

6092 PERRETTA v. PROMETHEUS DEVELOPMENT neous briefs may not exceed twenty (20) pages, and shall be due no later than June 13, 2008.

PRINTED FOR

ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICE—U.S. COURTS BY THOMSON REUTERS/WEST—SAN FRANCISCO

The summary, which does not constitute a part of the opinion of the court, is copyrighted © 2008 Thomson Reuters/West.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Perretta v. Prometheus Developement Company, Inc, (9th Cir. 2008).

Perretta v. Prometheus Developement Company, Inc (Perretta v. Prometheus Developement Company, Inc) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

§ 16103
California CORP § 16103(b)(3)