Perrelli v. Perrelli

284 A.D.2d 517, 727 N.Y.S.2d 622, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6832
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided June 25, 2001·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

—In an action for a divorce and ancillary relief, the defendant appeals from stated portions of an order of the Supreme Court, Putnam County (Sweeny, J.), dated December 8, 2000, which, inter alia, denied his cross motion to vacate a judgment of divorce of the same court (Sklaver, J.H.O.), dated March 7, 2000.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

Contrary to the defendant’s contention, the Judicial Hearing Officer had authority to enter the judgment of divorce, since an order of reference designating him to hear and determine all issues was made upon consent of the parties (see, CPLR 4317 [a]; cf., McCormack v McCormack, 174 AD2d 612).

The defendant’s remaining contention is unpreserved for appellate review. Ritter, J. P., McGinity, Smith and Cozier, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Perrelli v. Perrelli, 284 A.D.2d 517, 727 N.Y.S.2d 622, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6832 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2001).

284 A.D.2d 517 (Perrelli v. Perrelli) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Mendenhall v. Mendenhall
4 A.D.3d 344 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2004)
Tornheim v. Tornheim
297 A.D.2d 341 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2002)