Perrault v. White Sewing MacH. Co.

127 So. 271, 157 Miss. 167, 1930 Miss. LEXIS 248
CourtMississippi Supreme Court
DecidedMarch 31, 1930
DocketNo. 28411.
StatusPublished
Cited by13 cases

This text of 127 So. 271 (Perrault v. White Sewing MacH. Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Mississippi Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Perrault v. White Sewing MacH. Co., 127 So. 271, 157 Miss. 167, 1930 Miss. LEXIS 248 (Mich. 1930).

Opinion

Ethridge, P. J.,

delivered the opinion of the court.

The White Sewing Maching' Company, a corporation, was plaintiff and sued the appellant, Perrault, upon a promissory note made exhibit to the declaration, .which note reads as follows:

*170 “$739.00. Natchez,, Mississippi, March 27, 1925.
“For Value Received, Nine months after date, I promise to pay to order of White Sewing Machine Company, Seven Hundred thirty-nine 00/100 — Dollars, with interest from September 27, 1925, at the rate of six per cent per annum.
“(Please insert the name of the Bank to which yon wish us to send this note for collection).
“Bank Bank of Commerce at Natchez, Mississippi.
“The makers and endorsers severally waive presentment for payment, protest and notice of protest and nonpayment of this note, and agree that if collected after maturity, ten per cent for attorney’s fees shall be added, and in case of suit, judgment for same shall be included in judgment on note without any relief whatever from exemption laws.
“F1. J. Perrault.
“P. O. Address Natchez, Mississippi.
“No. of Note 2297102. Due December 27, 1925.
“Endorsed:
“Pay .Blank of Commerce or order for collection for White Sewing Machine Co., Cleveland, Ohio.
“J. C. Sanderson, Sec. and Treas.
“Credit 4/26/26— $35.00.”
Another exhibit to the declaration was .a contract signed by Perrault ordering certain sewing machines from the White Sewing Machine Company, together with attachments and advertising matter. This contract read as follows:
“Traveling Solicitor J. H. Ware.
“Date 3/12, 1925-,
“White Sewing’ Machine Co., Cleveland, Ohio.
“Gentlemen: Please ship by Freight Released, F. O. B. Cleveland, Ohio.
“To F. J. Perrault
“Town Natchez State * Miss.
“Via Freight When at once
*171 The Following White Sewing Machines, Etc.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

HEARTSOUTH, PLLC v. Boyd
865 So. 2d 1095 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 2003)
Rotenberry v. Hooker
864 So. 2d 266 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 2003)
Hollingsworth & Co. v. Nored (In Re Nored)
302 B.R. 833 (N.D. Mississippi, 2003)
HeartSouth, PLLC v. Timothy Boyd
Mississippi Supreme Court, 2002
HOUSING AUTHORITY OF LAUREL v. Gatlin
738 So. 2d 249 (Court of Appeals of Mississippi, 1998)
Crymes G. Pittman v. Weber Entergy Corporation
Mississippi Supreme Court, 1997
In Re Posey
57 B.R. 858 (N.D. Mississippi, 1985)
Continental Gin Co. v. Freeman
237 F. Supp. 240 (N.D. Mississippi, 1964)
Tupelo Spindle Co. v. Allis-Chalmers Manufacturing Co.
220 F. Supp. 771 (N.D. Mississippi, 1963)
Delta Loan & Finance Corp. v. Craven
95 So. 2d 104 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1957)
Credit Industrial Co. v. Adams County Lumber & Supply Co.
60 So. 2d 790 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1952)
Parker v. McCaskey Register Co.
171 So. 337 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1936)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
127 So. 271, 157 Miss. 167, 1930 Miss. LEXIS 248, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/perrault-v-white-sewing-mach-co-miss-1930.