Perper v. Edell

Supreme Court of Florida

Perper v. Edell

42 So. 2d 52, 1949 Fla. LEXIS 956

DecidedJuly 22, 1949

StatusPublished

This text of 42 So. 2d 52 (Perper v. Edell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Perper v. Edell, 42 So. 2d 52, 1949 Fla. LEXIS 956 (Fla. 1949).

Pincite

Opinions

Common-law action by A.L. Perper against Joseph Edell and Frieda Edell, his wife, and Harry Grossinger and Jennie Grossinger, his wife, for a broker's commission. From an adverse judgment, plaintiff appealed. On plaintiff's motion that cause be docketed and considered on transcript of record prepared by his directions.

Motion granted.

See also 35 So.2d 387. This cause having been considered on the motion of counsel for appellant that the cause be docketed and considered on the transcript of record described in said motion notwithstanding the order of the Circuit Court herein, it is ordered that said motion be and the same is hereby granted.

TERRELL, CHAPMAN, THOMAS and SEBRING, JJ., concur.

ADAMS, C.J., and BARNS and HOBSON, JJ., dissent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI