Perper v. Daniels

262 So. 2d 282, 1972 Fla. App. LEXIS 6752
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedMay 16, 1972
DocketNo. 71-1299
StatusPublished

This text of 262 So. 2d 282 (Perper v. Daniels) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Perper v. Daniels, 262 So. 2d 282, 1972 Fla. App. LEXIS 6752 (Fla. Ct. App. 1972).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant sued the buyer of a tract of land for a real estate commission. He alleged an oral promise to pay him a commission in the nature of a finder’s fee. Summary final judgment was entered for the defendant, appellee here. It is urged that a genuine issue of fraud is presented by the pleadings, affidavits, and deposition.

The trial court correctly found that appellant’s action was on an oral contract and that the defendant was entitled to judgment upon the admitted facts. See Poliakoff v. National Emblem Insurance Company, Fla.App.1971, 249 So.2d 477.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Poliakoff v. National Emblem Insurance Company
249 So. 2d 477 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1971)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
262 So. 2d 282, 1972 Fla. App. LEXIS 6752, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/perper-v-daniels-fladistctapp-1972.