Perper v. Daniels
This text of 262 So. 2d 282 (Perper v. Daniels) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Appellant sued the buyer of a tract of land for a real estate commission. He alleged an oral promise to pay him a commission in the nature of a finder’s fee. Summary final judgment was entered for the defendant, appellee here. It is urged that a genuine issue of fraud is presented by the pleadings, affidavits, and deposition.
The trial court correctly found that appellant’s action was on an oral contract and that the defendant was entitled to judgment upon the admitted facts. See Poliakoff v. National Emblem Insurance Company, Fla.App.1971, 249 So.2d 477.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
262 So. 2d 282, 1972 Fla. App. LEXIS 6752, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/perper-v-daniels-fladistctapp-1972.