Perper v. Daniels

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Perper v. Daniels

262 So. 2d 282, 1972 Fla. App. LEXIS 6752

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided May 16, 1972·No. No. 71-1299·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant sued the buyer of a tract of land for a real estate commission. He alleged an oral promise to pay him a commission in the nature of a finder’s fee. Summary final judgment was entered for the defendant, appellee here. It is urged that a genuine issue of fraud is presented by the pleadings, affidavits, and deposition.

The trial court correctly found that appellant’s action was on an oral contract and that the defendant was entitled to judgment upon the admitted facts. See Poliakoff v. National Emblem Insurance Company, Fla.App.1971, 249 So.2d 477.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Appellant sued the buyer of a tract of land for a real estate commission. He alleged an oral promise to pay him a commission in the nature of a finder’s fee. Summary final judgment was entered for the defendant, appellee here. It is urged that a genuine issue of fraud is presented by the pleadings, affidavits, and deposition.

The trial court correctly found that appellant’s action was on an oral contract and that the defendant was entitled to judgment upon the admitted facts. See Poliakoff v. National Emblem Insurance Company, Fla.App.1971, 249 So.2d 477.

Affirmed.

Perper v. Daniels, 262 So. 2d 282, 1972 Fla. App. LEXIS 6752 (Fla. Ct. App. 1972).

Pincite

262 So. 2d 282 (Perper v. Daniels) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related