Perotti v. Ishee

Ohio Supreme Court

Perotti v. Ishee

764 N.E.2d 443, 94 Ohio St. 3d 1499, 2002 Ohio LEXIS 679

CourtOhio Supreme Court

DecidedMarch 14, 2002

Docket01-2158

StatusPublished

This text of 764 N.E.2d 443 (Perotti v. Ishee) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Perotti v. Ishee, 764 N.E.2d 443, 94 Ohio St. 3d 1499, 2002 Ohio LEXIS 679 (Ohio 2002).

Pincite

Opinion

Mahoning App. No. 01CA88. This cause was filed as a discretionary appeal and claimed appeal of right. On March 4, 2002, this court declined jurisdiction and dismissed this appeal as not involving a substantial constitutional question. Upon sua sponte reconsideration of appellant’s jurisdictional memorandum, it is determined by the court that this cause originated in the court of appeals and therefore should have proceeded as an appeal of right pursuant to S.Ct.Prac.R. II(1)(A)(1).

IT IS ORDERED by the court, sua sponte, that this appeal be restored to the docket and proceed as an appeal of right; the Clerk shall issue an order for the transmittal of the record from the Court of Appeals for Mahoning County; and the parties shall proceed in accordance with S.CtPrac.R. VI.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mahoning App. No. 01CA88. This cause was filed as a discretionary appeal and claimed appeal of right. On March 4, 2002, this court declined jurisdiction and dismissed this appeal as not involving a substantial constitutional question. Upon sua sponte reconsideration of appellant’s jurisdictional memorandum, it is determined by the court that this cause originated in the court of appeals and therefore should have proceeded as an appeal of right pursuant to S.Ct.Prac.R. II(1)(A)(1).

IT IS ORDERED by the court, sua sponte, that this appeal be restored to the docket and proceed as an appeal of right; the Clerk shall issue an order for the transmittal of the record from the Court of Appeals for Mahoning County; and the parties shall proceed in accordance with S.CtPrac.R. VI.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

764 N.E.2d 443, 94 Ohio St. 3d 1499, 2002 Ohio LEXIS 679, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/perotti-v-ishee-ohio-2002.