Perniciaro v. Veniero

90 N.Y.S. 369
CourtAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York
DecidedNovember 10, 1904
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 90 N.Y.S. 369 (Perniciaro v. Veniero) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Perniciaro v. Veniero, 90 N.Y.S. 369 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1904).

Opinion

BISCHOFF, J.

The landlords excluded the tenant from a substantial portion of the demised premises—a space about six feet square— and the evidence justified the finding that the act of exclusion was not compelled by the order of the building department, so far as to necessitate an interference with this tenant’s possession, assuming that compulsion would excuse the eviction. There is nothing to distinguish the [370]*370situation from that presented in Hamilton v. Graybill, 19 Misc. Rep. 521, 43 N. Y. Supp. 1079, and, under the rule applied in that case, the rent was suspended.

Final order affirmed, with costs. All concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cohen v. Newman
91 Misc. 561 (Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 1915)
Bergman v. Papia
58 Misc. 533 (Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 1908)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
90 N.Y.S. 369, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/perniciaro-v-veniero-nyappterm-1904.