Pernell v. ALLLSTATE INSURANCE COMPANY
This text of 768 N.W.2d 325 (Pernell v. ALLLSTATE INSURANCE COMPANY) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Doris PERNELL, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
ALLLSTATE INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant-Appellant, and
QBE Insurance Corporation and IPA Insurance Program Administrators, L.L.C., Defendants.
Supreme Court of Michigan.
Order
On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the December 2, 2008 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
MARKMAN, J. (dissenting).
I would grant leave to appeal to consider whether the Court of Appeals properly extended Darnell v. Auto-Owners Ins. Co., 142 Mich.App. 1, 369 N.W.2d 243 (1985), to hold defendant liable for plaintiff's personal protection insurance benefits after defendant began paying those benefits, but then ceased after determining that another insurer had priority. Because Darnell, supra at 12, 369 N.W.2d 243, considered a priority dispute in the context of determining liability for attorney fees pursuant to MCL 500.3148, I question its relevance in determining liability for actual benefits.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
768 N.W.2d 325, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pernell-v-alllstate-insurance-company-mich-2009.