Permento v. Story
This text of 198 A.D. 913 (Permento v. Story) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Judgment unanimously affirmed, with costs, upon authority of Weigand v. United Traction Co. (221 N. Y. 39); Dolfini v. Erie R. R. Co. (178 id. 1); Farrell v. Fire Insurance Salvage Corps. (189 App. Div. 795). In Austin v. Long Island R. R. Co. (69 Hun, 67; affd., 140 N. Y. 639), and Kaplan v. Posner (192 App. Div. 59), cited by appellant, there was evidence of obstructions to plaintiff’s view of the approaching train or vehicle, which is entirely absent in the case at bar. In the case at bar plaintiff testified that there was no obstruction. Present — Blackmar, P. J., Rich, Kelly, Jaycox and Manning, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
198 A.D. 913, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/permento-v-story-nyappdiv-1921.