Permento v. Story

198 A.D. 913

Opinion

Judgment unanimously affirmed, with costs, upon authority of Weigand v. United Traction Co. (221 N. Y. 39); Dolfini v. Erie R. R. Co. (178 id. 1); Farrell v. Fire Insurance Salvage Corps. (189 App. Div. 795). In Austin v. Long Island R. R. Co. (69 Hun, 67; affd., 140 N. Y. 639), and Kaplan v. Posner (192 App. Div. 59), cited by appellant, there was evidence of obstructions to plaintiff’s view of the approaching train or vehicle, which is entirely absent in the case at bar. In the case at bar plaintiff testified that there was no obstruction. Present — Blackmar, P. J., Rich, Kelly, Jaycox and Manning, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Permento v. Story, 198 A.D. 913 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1921).

198 A.D. 913 (Permento v. Story) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Weigand v. . United Traction Co.
116 N.E. 345 (New York Court of Appeals, 1917)
Austin v. . Long Island Railroad Company
35 N.E. 892 (New York Court of Appeals, 1893)
Farrell v. Fire Insurance Salvage Corps
189 A.D. 795 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1919)
Kaplan v. Posner
192 A.D. 59 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1920)
Austin v. Long Island Railroad
23 N.Y.S. 193 (New York Supreme Court, 1893)