Permenter v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Permenter v. State

141 So. 3d 695, 2014 WL 2862615, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 9555

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedJune 25, 2014

DocketNo. 4D12-2948

StatusPublished

This text of 141 So. 3d 695 (Permenter v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Permenter v. State, 141 So. 3d 695, 2014 WL 2862615, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 9555 (Fla. Ct. App. 2014).

Pincite

Opinion

MAY, J.

The defendant appeals an order revoking his probation and imposing a 48.5-month prison sentence. He argues the trial court violated his Fourteenth Amendment due process right to confront witnesses against him by relying on statements of the victim and a witness, who did not testify at the violation hearing. We disagree. Having reviewed the record, we find sufficient non-hearsay evidence to support the trial court’s revocation of his probation. We therefore affirm.

Affirmed.

DAMOORGIAN, C.J., and WARNER, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

MAY, J.

The defendant appeals an order revoking his probation and imposing a 48.5-month prison sentence. He argues the trial court violated his Fourteenth Amendment due process right to confront witnesses against him by relying on statements of the victim and a witness, who did not testify at the violation hearing. We disagree. Having reviewed the record, we find sufficient non-hearsay evidence to support the trial court’s revocation of his probation. We therefore affirm.

Affirmed.

DAMOORGIAN, C.J., and WARNER, J., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

141 So. 3d 695, 2014 WL 2862615, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 9555, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/permenter-v-state-fladistctapp-2014.