Permenter v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Permenter v. State

141 So. 3d 695, 2014 WL 2862615, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 9555

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided June 25, 2014·No. No. 4D12-2948·Published

Opinion

MAY, J.

The defendant appeals an order revoking his probation and imposing a 48.5-month prison sentence. He argues the trial court violated his Fourteenth Amendment due process right to confront witnesses against him by relying on statements of the victim and a witness, who did not testify at the violation hearing. We disagree. Having reviewed the record, we find sufficient non-hearsay evidence to support the trial court’s revocation of his probation. We therefore affirm.

Affirmed.

DAMOORGIAN, C.J., and WARNER, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

MAY, J.

The defendant appeals an order revoking his probation and imposing a 48.5-month prison sentence. He argues the trial court violated his Fourteenth Amendment due process right to confront witnesses against him by relying on statements of the victim and a witness, who did not testify at the violation hearing. We disagree. Having reviewed the record, we find sufficient non-hearsay evidence to support the trial court’s revocation of his probation. We therefore affirm.

Affirmed.

DAMOORGIAN, C.J., and WARNER, J., concur.

Permenter v. State, 141 So. 3d 695, 2014 WL 2862615, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 9555 (Fla. Ct. App. 2014).

Pincite

141 So. 3d 695 (Permenter v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.