Permenter, R. v. Ferguson, T.
This text of Permenter, R. v. Ferguson, T. (Permenter, R. v. Ferguson, T.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA EASTERN DISTRICT
RYSHEEN PERMENTER, : No. 56 EM 2020 : Petitioner : : : v. : : : TAMMY FERGUSON, SUPERINTENDENT : SCI-GRADERFORD [SIC] AND SCI- : PHOENIX JOHN J. TALABER, : SECRETARY PENNSYLVANIA BOARD OF : PROBATION AND PAROLE, COREY : DAVIS ADMINISTRATOR OF KINTOCK : CORRECTIONAL CENTER, : : Respondents :
ORDER
PER CURIAM
AND NOW, this 10th day of September, 2020, the Application for Leave to File
Original Process is GRANTED, and the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus is DENIED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Permenter, R. v. Ferguson, T., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/permenter-r-v-ferguson-t-pa-2020.