Permanente S. S. Co. v. Hawaiian Dredging Co.

65 F. Supp. 321, 1945 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1561
CourtDistrict Court, N.D. California
DecidedOctober 22, 1945
DocketNo. 23975
StatusPublished

This text of 65 F. Supp. 321 (Permanente S. S. Co. v. Hawaiian Dredging Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, N.D. California primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Permanente S. S. Co. v. Hawaiian Dredging Co., 65 F. Supp. 321, 1945 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1561 (N.D. Cal. 1945).

Opinion

ROCHE, District Judge.

Findings of Fact

I. All of the parties and the subject matter of both the first and second causes of action herein are within the admiralty and maritime jurisdiction of the United States and of this Court.

II. At all times pertinent, libelant Permanente Steamship Company was a corporation duly organized and existing under the laws of the State of Nevada, having a place of business and doing business in the State and Northern District of California, Southern Division, and was the owner of the Steamship Philippa (formerly named and designated as the SS Cristobal), official number 145,934, and Permanente (formerly named and designated as the SS Ancon) official number 115,125, lawfully documented vessels of the United States.

III. At all times pertinent, respondents and each and all of them were corporations organized and existing under and by virtue of the laws of one or another of the States of the United States, having places of business and doing business in the State and Northern District of California, Southern Division.

IV. On or about the 21st day of March, 1941, in the Northern District of California, Southern Division, demise charters 'identical in form were duly entered into in writing by and between the libelants and the respondents whereby the libelant, as owner of the said Steamship Philippa and Permanente agreed to let and demise and the respondents, as charterers, agreed to hire and possess said vessels for the period of one year from and after date of delivery, with option to renew, for a charter hire to be computed at the rate of Three Dollars ($3) per deadweight ton per month. Said Steamship Philippa had and has a deadweight tonnage of 11,158 tons, and said Steamship Permanente had and has a deadweight of 11,114 tons. Exhibit A annexed to the libel is a true copy of the charter party entered into by and between the parties hereto covering the Steamship Permanente and an identical form of charter party, save for the names and tonnage of the respective vessels and the dates of execution, was entered into between the parties hereto covering the Steamship Philippa.

V. Thereafter, and on the 30th day of October, 1941, the parties to the said charters, libelant and respondents herein, entered into an agreement in writing extending the term of said two charter parties to and including December 31, 1943.

Exhibit B annexed to the libel is a true copy of said extension agreement.

VI. Said Steamship Permanente was delivered to and accepted by respondents on the 13th day of March, 1941, at 2:00 o’clock P. M., Pacific Standard Time, and from said date and hour to and until the 30th day of July, 1942, at 12:01 o’clock, A. M., Pacific War Time, said vessel was in the exclusive possession and use of respondents and during said time was under the sole management, control, operation, manning, victualing and navigation of respondent and was not in the possession or use of libelant.

Said Steamship Philippa was delivered to and accepted by respondents on the 28th day of April, 1941 at 8:00 o’clock A. M., Pacific Standard Time, and from said date and hour to and until the 25th day of July, 1942 at 12:01 o’clock A. M. Pacific War Time, said vessel was in the exclusive possession and use of respondents and during said time was-under the sole management, control, operation, manning, victualing and navigation of respondents and was not in the possession or use of libelant.

' Said Steamships were never at any time since the date of their delivery to respondents nor since any other times mentioned herein redelivered into the possession of libelant.

VII. On February 7, 1942, the President of the United States, by Executive Order 9054, created within the Office for Emergency Management of the Executive Offices of the President, a War Shipping Administration, under direction of an Administrator vested with the power and charged with the duty, among other things, to control the operations, purchase, charter, requisition and use of all ocean vessels under the flag and control of the United States, (with certain exceptions not here material) and to allocate such vessels for use by the Army, Navy, or other departments or agencies, or for use by the governments of the United Nations.

VIII. On or about April 19, 1942, the Administrator, War Shipping Administration, pursuant to the said Executive Order of the President, directed the requisition for use on a time charter basis, effective [323]*323as of the time of the Government’s taking possession thereof, of all merchant vessels of the United States of over 1,000 gross tons, including libelant’s said Steamships Permanente and Philippa. Respondents’ Exhibit A in evidence is a copy of a telegram, dated April 19, 1942, addressed to libelant and sent for the purpose of notifying it of the requisition of the two named vessels as aforesaid. Telegrams in the same form were sent at or about the same time to all other owners of merchant vessels of the United States of over 1,000 gross tons.

IX. Thereafter, the Administrator determined to modify the terms of requisition as to certain vessels, including libelant’s said Steamships Permanente and Philippa, from a requisition for use on a time charter basis to a requisition for use on a bare-boat or demise charter basis. Accordingly, on or about May 16, 1942, the • Administrator, War Shipping Administration, directed the modification of the previous notification referred to in Finding of Fact designated VIII hereof and provided for the requisitioning for use of said two Steamships on a bareboat or demise charter basis, effective upon their delivery to representatives of the Administrator. Respondents’ Exhibit B in evidence is a copy of a telegram dated May 16, 1942, addressed to libelant and sent to it for the purpose of notifying it of such modification. Telegrams in the same form were sent at or about the same time to all other owners of merchant vessels of the United States in every instance where the Administrator had determined to modify the terms of their requisition for use from a time charter basis to a bareboat or demise charter basis.

X. The War Shipping Administration dealt solely with libelant with respect to all matters concerning the requisition of said Steamships. It did not deal with respondents concerning such matters. The telegraphic notices of requisition aforesaid were addressed to and sent only to libelant. For fifteen months after libelant received the first requisition notice, libelant conducted negotiations with the War Shipping Administration as to the compensation to be paid to it on account of the requisition for use of said Steamship and as to the form of requisition charters which it claimed the Government was required to tender to it as a result of the requisition. Respondents had notice of the requisition but the War Shipping Administration did not at any time give formal notice thereof to respondents nor negotiate with respondents either as to the conditions of the requisitions, their effective dates, the terms of the requisition charters to be tendered, or the compensation to be paid because of the requisitions for use of the vessels; neither did respondents negotiate nor attempt to negotiate with the War Shipping Administration with respect to any of such matters.

XI. Subsequent to the receipt of the aforesaid telegram of April 19, 1942, and both prior to and subsequent to the receipt of the aforesaid telegram of May 16, 1942, libelant requested the Administrator and his authorized representatives not to effectuate said requisitions.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
65 F. Supp. 321, 1945 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1561, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/permanente-s-s-co-v-hawaiian-dredging-co-cand-1945.