Home/Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York/Perlus v. Spiess

Perlus v. Spiess

29 Misc. 761
CourtAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York
DecidedOctober 15, 1899
StatusPublished

This text of 29 Misc. 761 (Perlus v. Spiess) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Perlus v. Spiess, 29 Misc. 761 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1899).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The record failing to show that the defendants reside within the jurisdiction of the Municipal Court, the judgment must be reversed. Tyroler v. Gummersbach, 28 Misc. Rep. 151.

Present: Freedman, P. J.; MacLean and Leventritt, JJ.

Judgment reversed and new trial ordered, with costs to appellants to abide event.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Tyroler v. Gummersbach
28 Misc. 151 (Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 1899)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
29 Misc. 761, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/perlus-v-spiess-nyappterm-1899.