Perloff v. Kelmenson
226 A.D. 696
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided March 15, 1929·Published·Cited by 4 cases
Opinion
— Order denying defendant’s motion to dismiss the complaint upon the ground that plaintiff’s claim has been released modified so that it shall provide that the questions of fact as to the validity of the release shall be tried by a jury, whose findings shall be reported to the court for its action. (Rules Civ. Prac. rule 108.) As so modified the order is affirmed, without costs. Lazansky, P. J., Rich, Kapper, Carswell and Scudder, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Perloff v. Kelmenson, 226 A.D. 696 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1929).
226 A.D. 696 (Perloff v. Kelmenson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Campbell v. Muncie
246 A.D. 633 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1935)
Barker v. Conley
195 N.E. 677 (New York Court of Appeals, 1935)
Horlick v. Horlick
243 A.D. 559 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1934)