Perloff v. Kelmenson

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Perloff v. Kelmenson

226 A.D. 696

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMarch 15, 1929

StatusPublished

Cited by4 cases

This text of 226 A.D. 696 (Perloff v. Kelmenson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Perloff v. Kelmenson, 226 A.D. 696 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1929).

Pincite

Opinion

— Order denying defendant’s motion to dismiss the complaint upon the ground that plaintiff’s claim has been released modified so that it shall provide that the questions of fact as to the validity of the release shall be tried by a jury, whose findings shall be reported to the court for its action. (Rules Civ. Prac. rule 108.) As so modified the order is affirmed, without costs. Lazansky, P. J., Rich, Kapper, Carswell and Scudder, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

— Order denying defendant’s motion to dismiss the complaint upon the ground that plaintiff’s claim has been released modified so that it shall provide that the questions of fact as to the validity of the release shall be tried by a jury, whose findings shall be reported to the court for its action. (Rules Civ. Prac. rule 108.) As so modified the order is affirmed, without costs. Lazansky, P. J., Rich, Kapper, Carswell and Scudder, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

226 A.D. 696, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/perloff-v-kelmenson-nyappdiv-1929.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack