Perloff v. Crescent Motor Co.

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Perloff v. Crescent Motor Co.

6 Pelt. 132

CourtLouisiana Court of Appeal

DecidedApril 10, 1922

DocketNO. 8470

StatusPublished

This text of 6 Pelt. 132 (Perloff v. Crescent Motor Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Louisiana Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Perloff v. Crescent Motor Co., 6 Pelt. 132 (La. Ct. App. 1922).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

The above entitled cause having come on before this Court for trial on the 30th day of March, 1922, and counsel for plaintiff and appellee herein being present, but counsel for defendant and appellant, though absent at said trial, having advised the Court through his representative that defendant and appellant did not desire to further prosecute this appeal, and that the affirmation of the Judgment of the Lower Court was not opposed;

On motion of counsel for plaintiff and appellee, it is ordered adjudged and decreed that the Judgment herein appealed from be, and the same is hereby affirmed, appellant to pay costs of both courts.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

The above entitled cause having come on before this Court for trial on the 30th day of March, 1922, and counsel for plaintiff and appellee herein being present, but counsel for defendant and appellant, though absent at said trial, having advised the Court through his representative that defendant and appellant did not desire to further prosecute this appeal, and that the affirmation of the Judgment of the Lower Court was not opposed;

On motion of counsel for plaintiff and appellee, it is ordered adjudged and decreed that the Judgment herein appealed from be, and the same is hereby affirmed, appellant to pay costs of both courts.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

6 Pelt. 132, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/perloff-v-crescent-motor-co-lactapp-1922.