Perlman v. I. Blyn & Sons

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Perlman v. I. Blyn & Sons

155 A.D. 888, 139 N.Y.S. 1082

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedFebruary 15, 1913

StatusPublished

This text of 155 A.D. 888 (Perlman v. I. Blyn & Sons) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Perlman v. I. Blyn & Sons, 155 A.D. 888, 139 N.Y.S. 1082 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1913).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam:

The judgment and order appealed from should be reversed and a new trial ordered, with costs to appellant to abide the event, on the ground that the counsel for the plaintiff asked a witness on the stand: “ Are you connected with this insurance company that is in this case?” That question having been asked, counsel for the defendant moved to withdraw a j uror and to have a mistrial declared, on the ground that it was sought to prejudice the rights of the defendant to a fair and impartial [889]*889trial. (See Akin v. Lee, 206 N. Y. 20.) Present — Ingraham, P. J., McLaughlin, Clarke, Scott and Dowling, JJ. Judgment and order-reversed, new trial ordered, costs to appellant to abide event. Order to be settled on notice.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam:

The judgment and order appealed from should be reversed and a new trial ordered, with costs to appellant to abide the event, on the ground that the counsel for the plaintiff asked a witness on the stand: “ Are you connected with this insurance company that is in this case?” That question having been asked, counsel for the defendant moved to withdraw a j uror and to have a mistrial declared, on the ground that it was sought to prejudice the rights of the defendant to a fair and impartial [889]*889trial. (See Akin v. Lee, 206 N. Y. 20.) Present — Ingraham, P. J., McLaughlin, Clarke, Scott and Dowling, JJ. Judgment and order-reversed, new trial ordered, costs to appellant to abide event. Order to be settled on notice.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

155 A.D. 888, 139 N.Y.S. 1082, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/perlman-v-i-blyn-sons-nyappdiv-1913.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack