Perlman v. Falik

241 A.D. 667

Opinion

Judgment reversed and a new trial ordered, with costs to the appellant to abide the event. The question of contributory negligence is one of fact and should have been submitted to the jury. ( Nelson v. Nygren, 259 N. Y. 71.) Present — Finch, P. J., Martin, O’Malley, Townley and Glennon, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Perlman v. Falik, 241 A.D. 667 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1934).

241 A.D. 667 (Perlman v. Falik) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Nelson v. Nygren
181 N.E. 52 (New York Court of Appeals, 1932)