Perlin v. Thirty-Fourth Street Hotel Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Perlin v. Thirty-Fourth Street Hotel Corp.

248 A.D. 555

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided May 15, 1936·Published

Opinion

Order denying plaintiff’s motion to strike out the separate and

complete defense and the partial defense, on the ground that they are insufficient in law, or, to strike out certain paragraphs of the amended answer on the ground that they are conclusions of law, unanimously affirmed, with twenty dollars costs and disbursements. No opinion. Present — Martin, P. J., McAvoy, O’Malley, Untermyer and Dore, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order denying plaintiff’s motion to strike out the separate and

complete defense and the partial defense, on the ground that they are insufficient in law, or, to strike out certain paragraphs of the amended answer on the ground that they are conclusions of law, unanimously affirmed, with twenty dollars costs and disbursements. No opinion. Present — Martin, P. J., McAvoy, O’Malley, Untermyer and Dore, JJ.

Perlin v. Thirty-Fourth Street Hotel Corp., 248 A.D. 555 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1936).

Pincite

248 A.D. 555 (Perlin v. Thirty-Fourth Street Hotel Corp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.